Re: What Are the Chances That CICS/VS will Be Available for DOS/VS Under Hercules???
"dosvsoperator" <dosvsoperator-/[email protected]> Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:49:03 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Just one question: How then did we end up seeing DOS/360, DOS/VS, OS/MFT, OS/MVT, MVS 3.8j, et al. released to the public domain (Thank G-d and IBM for that!)??? Yours truly, --- In [email protected], "Fish" <fish@...> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > (Thread moved from [H390-DOSVS] to here) > > > Dave Wade wrote: > > dosvsoperator wrote: > > > > > I can understand where IBM is coming from. They're scared > > > that someone will try to run production IT of a "for profit" > > > concern on a Hercules mainframe in violation of a license > > > agreement! It's kind of a backhanded compliment to the emulator! > > > > I think the paranoid runs deeper than that. In the past the > > maintenance money paid for Maintenance and there was no need to > > force upgrades on folks. These days, like the rest of the > > "computer" industry, the whole Mainframe Marketing Bandwagon > > relies on selling frequent upgrades to both Hardware and Software. > [...] > > [...] you are caught in a never ending spiral or hardware and > > software upgrades. [...] > > I think Dave has hit the nail on the head: the elimination of the > "after-market" market (or more properly, the complete elimination of > "hand-me-downs"). > > Thank about it. One company outgrows its capacity and must upgrade to a new > more powerful model. Their existing hardware isn't powerful enough -- for > them. But who's to say it's not plenty powerful enough for some other much > smaller company who has also outgrown their existing capacity? Why can't > company A's system which IT has outgrown be "handed down" to the much > smaller company B? > > Because the software (specifically the operating system) required to RUN > that system is no longer being licensed! You can only get it from IBM and > IBM is no longer offering it. PURPOSELY. > > That younger brother of yours (or next door neighbor) who has outgrown his > clothes has to go out and buy NEW clothes because the old clothes his older, > bigger brother has outgrown is no longer available. The manufacturer has > taken them back and is no longer offering them. In fact it wouldn't surprise > me if they've destroyed them. > > And you of course can't use the newer operating systems on the older, > smaller, less powerful hardware either because they're purposely designed to > work only on the newer hardware that has all the specialized hardware and > instructions that they require to run. > > End result? No more hand-me-downs. You MUST go out and buy new. > > If IBM continued to license (offer) older versions of its operating systems > and software then they could be used by company B to run their enterprise on > company A's old used hardware, and company B would thus have no incentive to > purchase "new" hardware from IBM. The after-market market would grow and > flourish! Older hardware would INCREASE in value as there would be more of a > demand for it, and the sales volume of new hardware (and software!) would > suffer as a result. > > In conclusion, to continue hoping that "maybe SOME day IBM will release > [this/that old operating system/software]" is a complete waste of time in my > personal opinion. It's just NOT going to happen. :( > > - -- > "Fish" (David B. Trout) - fish@... > Fight Spam! Join CAUCE! <http://www.cauce.org/> > 7 reasons why HTML email is a bad thing > http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtml > PGP key fingerprints: > DH/DSS: 9F9B BAB0 BA7F C458 1A89 FE26 48F5 D7F4 C4EE 3E2A > RSA: 6B37 7110 7201 9917 9B0D 99E3 55DB 5D58 FADE 4A52 > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP Desktop 9.8.0 (Build 2158) > Charset: us-ascii > > wj8DBQFK4CW/SPXX9MTuPioRAv19AKCbJgBiZZOlZQBtPYLKz3mZVPK9IQCcDg2A > K+TvIbUzcMEsdlC4ojHEND0= > =z4rW > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >