RE: Re: slanted article "Inside System Storage -- by Tony Pearson"

Paul Raulerson wrote:

[...]
> But they left the business when it became obvious
> that IBM no longer had to cater to them per the
> consent decree. Those companies made money pretty
> much only because IBM was not allowed to openly
> compete with them.

IMO a more accurate/truthful wording would be:

  But they left the business when it became obvious
  that IBM no longer had to compete fairly once the
  consent decree expired. Those companies made money
  pretty much only because IBM was forced to compete
  fairly with them.


-- 
"Fish" (David B. Trout) 
 [email protected]





------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-advocacy/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    hercules-advocacy-fullfeatured-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    hercules-advocacy-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/