Re: terminal without telnet
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
---In [email protected], <gerhardp@...> wrote : >> This is probably the most egregious of all - >> as we've already discussed there is no such >> thing as "EBCDIC ANSI". Also as previously >> mentioned neither the 1052 nor the 3215 are >> supported device types under TCAM, VTAM, or >> TSO in MVS 3.8J. Just when it seemed this >> issue had been beaten to death, it pops up >> here on this list... > This is disputable? I interpret ANSI as stipulating a terminal that > responds to control sequences containing & and [, and using only ESC, not &. > printable characters for the data in these. This would seem to any > terminal character set, not just ASCII. And given that micro-emacs is *already working* (to some extent) under both PDOS and MVS, after having been compiled to drive an EBCDIC ANSI terminal, what name do you suggest we call this *working terminal*? BFN. Paul.