Re: terminal without telnet

"Dave McGuire [email protected] [hercules-390]" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 4/10/19 9:48 PM, kerravon86-/[email protected] [hercules-390] wrote:
>>>> I think we should be exchanging mail using software similar to Fidonet
>>>> or UUCP, running on our mainframe systems.
> 
>>> I like the idea.
>>>
>>> But, sadly, I think it would exclude a lot of people.
> 
>>> Being the masochist that I am, I'd be interested in a reincarnation of
>>> BITNET and PROFS (?). (I've actually casually looked for the software
>>> in the past.)
> 
>>> I also have functional (but unused) UUCP now. ():-)
> 
>> The Museum would be interested in participating in any or all of the
>> above, time permitting.
> 
> What hardware would you be using to
> exchange UUCP data? And can you
> describe the hardware a bit? I would
> like PDOS/390 to be able to drive
> that hardware.

  Well, the "cat's meow" for UUCP was always the Telebit Trailblazer (it
spoofs parts of the UUCP protocol for dramatic improvements in
performance), but I assumed we'd be using IP transport for UUCP.

            -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.