Re: terminal without telnet
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/10/19 9:48 PM, kerravon86-/[email protected] [hercules-390] wrote: >>>> I think we should be exchanging mail using software similar to Fidonet >>>> or UUCP, running on our mainframe systems. > >>> I like the idea. >>> >>> But, sadly, I think it would exclude a lot of people. > >>> Being the masochist that I am, I'd be interested in a reincarnation of >>> BITNET and PROFS (?). (I've actually casually looked for the software >>> in the past.) > >>> I also have functional (but unused) UUCP now. ():-) > >> The Museum would be interested in participating in any or all of the >> above, time permitting. > > What hardware would you be using to > exchange UUCP data? And can you > describe the hardware a bit? I would > like PDOS/390 to be able to drive > that hardware. Well, the "cat's meow" for UUCP was always the Telebit Trailblazer (it spoofs parts of the UUCP protocol for dramatic improvements in performance), but I assumed we'd be using IP transport for UUCP. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA