Re: Re: Wait State 00050064

"I mean, perhaps such systems (as the ES/9000 that Dave mentioned) only
supported 370 operating systems that were "LPAR-aware"? <shrug>"

This is 100% correct Fish.

As I pointed out in another post, the manual pointed to by Dave says that
the supported OS's for LPARs started at MVS/SP V2R1.

Joe

On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 11:53 AM ''Fish' (David B. Trout)'
[email protected] [H390-MVS] <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Robert Schreiber wrote:
>
> > S/370 has no idea what an LPAR is. Thus, the fact that
> > it's running in one should be shielded so that it cannot
> > be confused. @Tony_Harminc correctly pointed out that the
> > image expects the machine to look/act like GA22-7000-10.
> > The problem that I caused myself was because STIDP did not
> > adhere to the S/370 spec with the configuration that I
> > (wrongly) created.
>
> As I said to Dave, I would agree. I don't like the current behavior myself
> for the exact reason you and Tony offered.
>
> But as I also said to Dave, I was not (and still AM not!) in any position
> to question it, not having any experience with such beasts.
>
> I'm thinking your "FORCE370" option is best we can hope for right now.
>
> UNLESS of course, someone can step up and offer solid, clearly convincing
> evidence that the current behavior is absolutely, 100%, without any
> question, WRONG. I mean, perhaps such systems (as the ES/9000 that Dave
> mentioned) only supported 370 operating systems that were "LPAR-aware"?
> <shrug>
>
> (I don't like this issue any more than the rest of you!)
> --
> "Fish" (David B. Trout)
> Software Development Laboratories
> http://www.softdevlabs.com
> mail: [email protected]
>
> 
>