Re: SXMACLIB

"Joe Monk [email protected] [H390-MVS]" <[email protected]> Sat, 28 Sep 2019 07:31:26 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.mvs
Message-ID <CAPcd4G9dDkOEYDb1a=kb1faTWYPTHfMbHVqD2h+iGGn+T4Q5xA@mail.gmail.com>
"What's your point?"

His point is that it will not fail because it will never look in the MACLIB
for an LG macro.

Joe

On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 7:30 AM kerravon86-/[email protected] [H390-MVS] <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> ---In [email protected], <gerhardp@...> wrote :
>
> >> No, if he wants to use the LG instruction,
> >> and he has added that to a non-standard
> >> library, then the assembly JCL, that uses
> >> that non-standard library, will fail on a
> >> standard z/OS system, and people will
> >> be wondering why on earth he has used
> >> a non-standard dataset when all his
> >> program does is an LG.
>
> > You really need to learn more about the systems you use. If a macro
> > library containing LG is in the SYSLIB concatenation, the high-level
> > assembler will use its internal definition, and never use the macro!
>
> I am fully aware of that. What's your point? On
> z/OS I expect the internal definition to be used,
> and on MVS/380 I expect the version in
> SYS1.MACLIB to be used, and, from the
> programmer's perspective, be identical. And
> no non-standard library needs to be included.
> Only SYS1.MACLIB which also exists on
> z/OS (without the LG macro).
>
> BFN. Paul.
> 
>