Re: SXMACLIB

Hello!
ENOUGH! Second or third or even fourth person to state something else
on that diversion, will find themselves moderated. (If I can figure
out how!) So if all of you want to continue to argue an issue that was
over and done with well before this thread was even considered, it
will have to be off line.
-----
Gregg C Levine [email protected]
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."

On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 7:30 PM kerravon86-/[email protected] [H390-MVS]
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> ---In [email protected], <joemonk64@...> wrote :
>
> > A copyright notice has never been required
> > for unpublished works.
>
> MVS 3.8J is a published work, in my opinion.
>
> > As you will note, OS/VS2 MVS is an unpublished
> > work.
>
> I don't know why you think that. It looks
> published to me. That's why we have it.
> We didn't steal it from IBM.
>
> > To get it in 1976, you had to buy or rent a mainframe.
> > IBM would not just give you the program for free.
>
> That would amount to a "copying fee". That's
> just the way IBM decided to handle their
> freeware. It doesn't stop the work from being
> published and thus public domain.
>
> BFN. Paul.
>
>
> ------------------------------------
> Posted by: kerravon86-/[email protected]
> ------------------------------------