Re: Re: Fullscreen application Specs

>But we are all using the same autosave name

>I need to fix that and a few other places so that it will autosave with a uniqe name.
>Best is th signon name - but then I have to ad the checking to allow you to sign the same user only inone session concurrently.

How about sign-on-name + session ctr ?

Brexx  autoXXXX                 Brexx auto0001
Brexx autoXXX                    Brexx auto0002
...
Then don't have to limit the logon name to only one logon

On 8/5/10, Rocky <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mike
>
> Actually there is no problem with File contention
> What happened to you was Program Check -Because some DUMB programmer didn;t
> check his code thouroughly -
> Same thing happened to Paulo  - Fixed now
>
> File contention is enqueued.
>
> YOu read a file - for the second or so that you are reading it is enqueued
> but as soon as you finish I can read it.
>
> We both work in memory - YOu say save and I say save --- The save routine is
> in enqueued whoever get there last wins
>
> Where I do have a problem is on the utity files
>
> autosave
> and the flist
> and some others
>
> Most of them are also enqueued so there wont be an abend problem
> But we are all using the same autosave name
>
> I need to fix that and a few other places so that it will autosave with a
> uniqe name.
> Best is th signon name - but then I have to ad the checking to allow you to
> sign the same user only inone session concurrently.
> I built the fields for that is the design - just didn;t get around to
> implementing.
>
> Not a big issue and once we dide how to use this magical tool We will be
> smarter
>
> I saw that you linked to the BREXX DISK as "G"
>
> GREAT --- Now I can see all the "C" stuff in full screen mode and maybe
> understand something
>
> ROC
>
>
>
>
>   _____
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Mike Stramba
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 18:44
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [H390-VM] Re: Fullscreen application Specs
>
>
>
>
> Roc,
>
> As we've just seen there's a problem with file contention / multi
> users accessing the same file.
>
> If possible I would like to see BROWSE of a file possible if it's
> already opened for EDIT by another user.
>
> I guess EDIT of a file by two users could be permitted but only if
> the "second" user to edit the file is forced to save the file under a
> different name than the original. That could get messy though, if
> the first user decides to try a "save as" using the same file name as
> User#2 used.
>
> Probably needlessly complex, unless you're really bored / looking for
> a challenge ;)
>
> Speaking of "Save As", is there a way to do that yet?
>
> On 8/5/10, paoloG <[email protected] <mailto:crc%40alce1.tuttopmi.it> >
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> --- In [email protected] <mailto:H390-VM%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Rocky" <rocsystems@...> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> HERE IS THE GOOD NEWS
>>> There is no BAD NEWS.
>>>
>>> The SAVE- FILE routines are now working - You can actually edit and then
>>> save the file
>>
>> Rocky,
>>
>> I created a little file (ROCKY TEST A), the deleted all the lines -
>> typed I on line 000000 to create a new line and got a terminal stuck.
>> From other terminals DIAL CMSUSER didn't work.
>>
>> I permitted myself to restart CMUSER Virtual machine and now everything is
>> working fine.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>