Re: Re: Sixpack 1.2: how to log in two users?
Fran Hensler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.vm |
|---|---|
| Organization | Slippery Rock University - Computing Services |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bob -
I have not installed the 1.2 beta SixPack.
I have in DMKRIO:
RDEVICE ADDRESS=(2C0,7),DEVTYPE=3278,MODEL=4
and my SixPack.conf has:
# Console Printers
0009 3215-C NOPROMPT
000A 1052 NOPROMPT
# Display Terminals
02C0 3270
02C1 3270
02C2 3270
02C3 3270
02C4 3270
When I do a CP Q 2C0-2C7 I get:
GRAF 2C0 LOGON AS MAINT
GRAF 2C1 ENABLED
GRAF 2C2 ENABLED
GRAF 2C3 ENABLED
GRAF 2C4 ENABLED
GRAF 2C5 OFFLINE
GRAF 2C6 OFFLINE
GRAF 2C7 OFFLINE
The 5 terminals I have in the conf file were all ENAbled when VM
came up.
I can connect to all 5 enabled terminals.
I have no Model-2 terminals in my CONF.
Perhaps that is the key.
/Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania USA for 47 years
mailto:[email protected] http://zvm.sru.edu/~fjh +1.724.738.2153
"Yes, Virginia, there is a Slippery Rock"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:48:50 -0000 Robert O'Hara said:
>Mike,
>
>Well, you have just exposed me as a noob regarding DMKRIO, which is the file
>that defines CP's I/O configuration. The VM Sixpack DMKRIO ASSEMBLE is on
>MAINT
>94, and has the following lines for terminals and their controllers:
>
>RCTLUNIT ADDRESS=018,CUTYPE=3215
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=004,DEVTYPE=3215
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=005,DEVTYPE=3215
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=006,DEVTYPE=3215
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=007,DEVTYPE=3215
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=008,DEVTYPE=3215
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=009,DEVTYPE=3215
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=00A,DEVTYPE=3215
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=(01F),DEVTYPE=3215
>
>RDEVICE ADDRESS=(010,7),DEVTYPE=3277
>
>RCTLUNIT ADDRESS=0C0,CUTYPE=3272,FEATURE=32-DEVICE
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=(0C0,32),DEVTYPE=3277
>
>RCTLUNIT ADDRESS=1C0,CUTYPE=3272,FEATURE=16-DEVICE
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=(1C0,7),DEVTYPE=3277
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=(1C7),DEVTYPE=3284
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=(1C8,7),DEVTYPE=3277
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=(1CF),DEVTYPE=3284
>
>RCTLUNIT ADDRESS=2C0,CUTYPE=3272,FEATURE=16-DEVICE
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=(2C0,7),DEVTYPE=3278,MODEL=4
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=(2C7),DEVTYPE=3284
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=(2C8,7),DEVTYPE=3277
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=(2CF),DEVTYPE=3284
>
>RCTLUNIT ADDRESS=3C0,CUTYPE=3272,FEATURE=16-DEVICE
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=(3C0,7),DEVTYPE=3277
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=(3C7),DEVTYPE=3284
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=(3C8,7),DEVTYPE=3277
> RDEVICE ADDRESS=(3CF),DEVTYPE=3284
>
>The configuration file as currently shipped with the SixPack does not define
>this many terminals. If I expand it to match the above, it looks like this:
>
>0009 3215-C NOPROMPT
>000A 1052 NOPROMPT
>
>00C0.32 3270
>01C0.7 3270
>01C8.7 3270
>02C0.7 3270
>02C8.7 3270
>03C0.7 3270
>03C8.7 3270
>
>With the above configuration, I can connect many 3278-2 (24 line) terminals.
>They come in at 0C0 and go up from there.
>
>Also, I can connect a 3278-4 (40 line) terminal at 2C0. But I cannot connect a
>second 3278-4.
>
>Does anyone know what is amiss here?
>
>Thanks, Bob
>
>
>
>--- In [email protected], Mike Voss <mike@...> wrote:
>>
>> Now for an *actual* noob question:
>>
>> terminals 0C0-0C2 are defined in hercules, but I can only open a session and
>connect to CP through 0C0. 0C1 just sits at the Hercules banner.
>>
>> I've heard the term directory, how does that interact with or substitute for
>VM's IOGEN? Where do I find either of these entities? -Or does this have
>nothing
>at all to do with that?
>>
>> A two-or-three-sentence primer on VM I/O targeted to an MVSer will probably
>kickstart me suitably. I know MVS sysgens but this seems to come at me a little
>bit sideways. I'll wager that at the end of the day it's more familiar than I
>think.
>> I always secretly wanted to be a DOS/VM guy but none of my employers ever
>wanted to, er, "re-size" their existing MVS installation. At my very first shop
>we were bringing the systems in-house from a service bureau, and all the VM
>manuals had arrived, and I was burning through those when they changed their
>minds and I had to learn instead to support MVS/SP. Can't complain, it just
>would have been fun... -and retrospectively, the right call for a company of
>that size. IBM sales was just too darn good.
>>
>
>
>