Re: IBM F Assembler

I believe the below change is a PTF, not new
development.

Are you able to look at the two versions and
tell which one is more advanced?

If it's not yours, perhaps you're missing
some PTFs that Phil Roberts found at a later
date?

Thanks.  Paul.




--- In [email protected], "Paul G" <pfg504@...> wrote:
>
> There might have been changes made by the TurnKey group past the original distribution. There are two changes included, one is all of the PTFs available to 38J. The other was a start at adding new instructions.
> 
> Paul G
> 
> --- In [email protected], "kerravon86" <kerravon86@> wrote:
> >
> > Paul, that link doesn't seem to work for me.
> > 
> > When I got what I thought was your latest version a
> > few months ago, I found discrepancies like this:
> > 
> > http://mvs380.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mvs380/mvssrc/asm/xfour.asm?r1=1.2&r2=1\
> > .2.12.2
> > 
> > So a prominent difference is the deletion of
> > these lines:
> > 
> > CH R14,JLITLNG SEE IF LONGER
> > BNH LITERAL4 NOPE
> > 
> > at line 646.
> > 
> > 
> > when compared to TK3SU1 (or MVS/380 1.0).
> > 
> > As far as I can tell, the TK3SU1 is more advanced,
> > so I wasn't able to use your code as-is.
> > 
> > Any idea about that?
> > 
> > Thanks.  Paul.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "Paul G" <pfg504@> wrote:
> > >
> > > All of the PTF available for IFOX00 were translated back to source over two years ago and are available at
> > > 
> > >  http://f1.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/8IxyTGEinu_7qEBrM4LylRzw_f9RZuekiSXqrfEgvVCmq2OMMP7GoSkWjwIrzke2284VGE7Jo_kmMzEbWETD3g/COMPILERS%20and%20ASSEMBLERS/IFOX00.20080909.het
> > > 
> > > The tape is in both VM and MVS format.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Paul G
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], "John P. Baker" <jbaker314@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Is the source code for the IBM F Assembler included with the SixPack
> > > > distribution?
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > If not, is it available elsewhere?
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > John P. Baker
> > > >
> > >
> >
>