Re: update etiquette

The boss I had when I worked on Rel 6 for a living would have insisted on a new update. In
recent times, I have been working by myself on a z/VM system and got lazy and would have
just modified HRC101DS. I have gotten into trouble with that laziness so it would be
better if you created a new update with comments that HRC101DS incorrectly removed the
line and this new update is putting it back in. Updates and AUX files are the history
books of VM.

/Tom Kern

On 9/30/2010 1:45 AM, Robert O'Hara wrote:
> Gents,
> 
> I finally have enough time to bring the VM SixPack version 1.2 to completion. Right now
> I'm going through posts from the past months reporting bugs or other issues.
> 
> One was reporting an endless loop when you type QUERY SYNONYM ALL. The fix is to remove a
> line from the DMSQRY HRC101DS update file, which incorrectly deleted a line from the
> original source file.
> 
> Question: should I simply revise this update file (from 2006)? Or should I create a new
> update file that effectively restores the deleted line?
> 
> Thanks, Bob