RE: Re: Announcing the VM/370 and VM/380 "SixPack" version 1.2 release candidate 1!
"Rocky" <[email protected]> Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:24:50 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.vm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
All Forget it. You will not get me into this silly discussion. I hereby grant to all the right to do whatever they want with the Code To manipulate in any possible way they can, to improve on it , or to*&(*& it up as much as they want. They can give me credit or not They can sell it Make a profit and spend it on trips to Hawaii visiting Brian, They can invite me along for the ride or not. They can use it or trash it as they see fit. My only request not requirement is that now and then you mention that it is based on Rocky's original developnment. Paolo - You can take the sign on screen out of the code --- Get rid of the UserId table as well at the same time. That was on my list of things to do Maybe as an option though. Still might want to develop an application to work off this that would need a signon. Fear not - change at will I promise not to sue you. Most that I expect is the next time I am in Rome you take me to a nice restaurant. After the above statement if anybody is still afraid to change anything, then more power to you, you are a better man than I. I cannot help you. Roc BTW ---- Has anybody actually used it or is this just BS to pass the time It Can't be that good that nobody has any problems at all except with the copyright? Not even a suggestion for improvement?????? I got one message from Faust about the IND$FILE which turned out to be a user error. BTW --- I have problem with the PIPE character in IND$FILE simulation Translates wrong already fixed for the next release Roc _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of kerravon86 Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 13:41 To: [email protected] Subject: [H390-VM] Re: Announcing the VM/370 and VM/380 "SixPack" version 1.2 release candidate 1! --- In [email protected] <mailto:H390-VM%40yahoogroups.com> , "Dave" <dave.g4ugm@...> wrote: > > If you want to grant as many rights as possible, and > yet protect yourself a little then I suggest BSD. Protect from what? BSD just ensures that you get creditted at some level for your work. And then of course, if you don't think you got creditted sufficiently, you are free to take the user to court. So to protect the user (ie developer) from the fear of courts, I use public domain. Not possible for me to take someone to court. I'm no longer the owner. The public is. I don't consider the job to be done until it's in the public domain. So e.g. we'll eventually have an unrestricted C compiler for MVS (GCC) in another 140 years or thereabouts, when the copyright expires. PDPCLIB doesn't require the 140 year wait. BFN. Paul.