Re: Announcing the VM/370 and VM/380 "SixPack" version 1.2 release candidate 1!

Herculeans,

Okay, I bit, so to speak, and I cracked open the the "SixPack"!

While it is interesting that it seems to use Hercules as the "default console", however, what amendments to the configuration file would be requisite in pursuance of using a regular 3270 as the console instead for the "SixPack"?


Thanks,

Blake


--- In [email protected], "Dave" <dave.g4ugm@...> wrote:
>
> It has some disclaimers that may help if some one says you gave them the
> code for a purpose and then claim its not fit for the purpose.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> kerravon86
> Sent: 10 October 2010 12:41
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [H390-VM] Re: Announcing the VM/370 and VM/380 "SixPack" version
> 1.2 release candidate 1!
> 
>  
> 
>   
> 
> --- In [email protected] <mailto:H390-VM%40yahoogroups.com> , "Dave"
> <dave.g4ugm@> wrote:
> >
> > If you want to grant as many rights as possible, and 
> > yet protect yourself a little then I suggest BSD.
> 
> Protect from what?
> 
> BSD just ensures that you get creditted at some
> level for your work.
> 
> And then of course, if you don't think you got
> creditted sufficiently, you are free to take the
> user to court.
> 
> So to protect the user (ie developer) from the
> fear of courts, I use public domain. Not possible
> for me to take someone to court. I'm no longer
> the owner. The public is.
> 
> I don't consider the job to be done until it's in
> the public domain. So e.g. we'll eventually have
> an unrestricted C compiler for MVS (GCC) in another 
> 140 years or thereabouts, when the copyright expires.
> 
> PDPCLIB doesn't require the 140 year wait.
> 
> BFN. Paul.
>