RE: Re: SixPack mods for Linux users
"Dave" <[email protected]> Sun, 17 Oct 2010 08:47:14 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.vm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <0657C1E75BC6445192738649A26E56A0@EMACHINE> |
Try using literally what you typed, i.e. cd "./pat Dave p.s. I suspect the different behaviours you see are because of slight differences in the CMD options in effect at the time you type the commands. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of "Fish" (David B. Trout) > Sent: 17 October 2010 07:53 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [H390-VM] Re: SixPack mods for Linux users > > Fish wrote: > > [...] > > Windows has supported *either* forward slash *OR* backward slash > > for many, many years now. > > More specifically, Windows has accepted either since its inception > (Windows > version 1.0! i.e. PRE Windows 3.1!). > > It was only the command interpreter (i.e. cmd.exe, i.e. the command-prompt > environment) which *originally* did not support forward slashes because of > its use as an option indicator (e.g. "command /option1 /option2"), but > that > was fixed fairly early on. > > I *do* know for a fact that AT LEAST since Windows 2000 (and *probably* > since Windows 95) the command interpreter (cmd.exe) has supported forward > slashes in paths. I do note however that the following does, interestingly > enough, throw an error: > > Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7600] > Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. > > C:\Users\Fish>cd /documents > The system cannot find the path specified. > > > HOWEVER... changing the syntax ever so slightly to be a more properly > formed > *relative* path DOES work just fine: > > C:\Users\Fish>cd ./documents > > C:\Users\Fish\Documents> > > > This is on Windows 7, but I suspect it should prove to be true on every > Windows system currently in existence. > > -- > "Fish" (David B. Trout) > [email protected] > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >