Re: [PATCH 4/5] migration: Fix rare hang of migration_channel_read_peek()
Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.qemu |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 11:52:46AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote: > In an unlikely case, when a migration stream is attached to the destination > QEMU and only send <4 bytes to the channel as magic, it's possible that > migration_channel_read_peek() may spin forever without yielding in the main > thread causing two unwanted consequences: > > - CPU will spin 100% waiting for the rest bytes until it reaches 4 > - (more importantly..) Main thread is stuck during this process as the qio > operation won't really yield the coroutine > > Fix it by consuming the bytes that arrived. > > Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/work_items/3889 > Cc: Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]> > Reported-by: Feifan Qian <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <[email protected]> > --- > migration/channel.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/migration/channel.c b/migration/channel.c > index 1e2935f926..28fe1d2906 100644 > --- a/migration/channel.c > +++ b/migration/channel.c > @@ -294,11 +294,31 @@ int migration_channel_read_peek(QIOChannel *ioc, > return -1; > } > > - if (len == buflen) { > + if (len == iov.iov_len) { > break; > - } > + } else if (len == 0) { > + qio_channel_wait_cond(ioc, G_IO_IN); > + } else { > + ssize_t received = len; > > - qio_channel_wait_cond(ioc, G_IO_IN); > + /* > + * Partially arrived, read out to make qio_channel_wait_cond() > + * won't return immediately, causing an unwanted spin on this > + * CPU. > + */ > + iov.iov_len = len; > + len = qio_channel_readv_full(ioc, &iov, 1, NULL, NULL, 0, errp); Sure this breaks the API behaviour that the caller is expecting to see. migration_channel_identify will call migration_channel_read_peek to match the magic bytes. But something later in the flow will actually try to read the magic bytes. By consuming them in this migration_channel_read_peek method, surely we're breaking the code that wants to read the bytes later. > + /* > + * QIO_CHANNEL_ERR_BLOCK also shouldn't happen, due to the > + * prior peek just happened. We should be pretty sure we will > + * read what we peeked, or the channel was broken. > + */ > + if (len != received) { > + return -1; > + } > + iov.iov_base += received; > + iov.iov_len = buflen - received; > + } > } > > return 0; > -- > 2.54.0 > With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com ~~ https://hachyderm.io/@berrange :| |: https://libvirt.org ~~ https://entangle-photo.org :| |: https://pixelfed.art/berrange ~~ https://fstop138.berrange.com :|