Re: [PATCH v2 01/53] qapi: add QAPITypeInfo struct definition

Markus Armbruster <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.emulators.qemu
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Marc-André Lureau <[email protected]> writes:

> Introduce a minimal struct that pairs a QAPI type's internal name with
> its "masked" introspection name. Generated constants of this type will
> let QOM property registration carry a reliable reference to the QAPI
> schema and possibly other associated data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <[email protected]>
> ---
>  include/qapi/qapi-type-info.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/qapi/qapi-type-info.h b/include/qapi/qapi-type-info.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..a7a470af731
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/qapi/qapi-type-info.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +/*
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef QAPI_TYPE_INFO_H
> +#define QAPI_TYPE_INFO_H
> +
> +#include "qapi/util.h"
> +
> +/**
> + * QAPITypeInfo - QAPI type metadata
> + *
> + * @name: QAPI type name (e.g. "str", "OnOffAuto", "int32List").
> + *        QOM uses this as the property type string.
> + * @schema_name: Name of the type in the QAPI introspection schema, assigned by
> + *        scripts/qapi/introspect.py (e.g. "368"). NULL for builtin types not
> + *        individually present in the schema.

"Schema" is ambiguous here: there's the QAPI schema
(e.g. qapi/qapi-schema.json and its sub-modules), and the SchemaInfo
returned by query-qmp-schema.  Could well lead to confusion.

What about @masked_name?

> + * @lookup: QEnumLookup for this type, or NULL for non-enum types.
> + *        visit_type_enum(), qapi_enum_parse(), and qapi_enum_lookup()
> + *        all rely on it.

Not yet.  Either mention that in the commit message, or add the member
later, when the comment is correct.

> + * @list: The list-type counterpart, or NULL if none exists.
> + *        str_type_info.list points to strList_type_info.  qdev array
> + *        properties follow this to find the list type for their element.

Likewise.

> + */
> +typedef struct QAPITypeInfo {
> +    const char *name;
> +    const char *schema_name;
> +    const QEnumLookup *lookup;
> +    const struct QAPITypeInfo *list;
> +} QAPITypeInfo;
> +
> +#endif /* QAPI_TYPE_INFO_H */

This is somewhat related to SchemaInfo, which is also meta-data about
QAPI types (and also commands and events).

SchemaInfo only has the masked name[*].  It has a reference from array
type to element type instead of the other way round.  Everything else in
QAPITypeInfo is also in SchemaInfo, I believe.

So far, QEMU uses SchemaInfo only around qmp_query_qmp_schema().
qmp_query_qmp_schema() a SchemaInfoList on the fly from something else,
and the QMP core (it's only caller) then converts it via QObject to a
string reply.

Now I need to digress into history a bit.

The value of query-qmp-schema is fixed at compile time.  My initial
version simply generated the fixed reply as string.  Efficient, because
it doesn't build a (bulky!) QObject reply.  Also a bit hacky.

This got in the way of QAPI 'if' conditionals, so commit 7d0f982b
switched to a pointer-less variation of the QObject that can be
generated as data more easily: QLitObject[].  query-qmp-schema converts
this to QObject every time it runs.  The QLitObject[] would be awkward
to use for anything else.

End of digression.

I wonder whether it could make sense to have a single repository of QAPI
type meta data, usable both for query-qmp-schema and for your QOM work.
Something QOM could use about as easily as QAPITypeInfo, and
query-qmp-schema could convert to its reply.

At this time, this is an idea phrased as a question.  Is it a good idea?
I'm not sure.  Even if it is, I'm not sure it should be implemented
right away.  I'm just sharing the idea.


[*] The QAPI generator has an option to make it have only the unmasked
names.  Occasionally convenient when messing around.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.