Re: [PATCH RFC 04/15] net/vhost-user: add memory isolation
Connor Kite <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Aug 2026 16:43:08 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.qemu.block,gmane.comp.emulators.qemu |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+spn3oXmgk7_LMP+hZRDPRTQX8qm0uBGAyztsq+Yu4_d4_ZKg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 11:48 AM Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This is dead code (hence G_GNUC_UNUSED) and is harder to review because > we don't know how it will be used until later in the patch series. I > guess vhost_user_init() and net_passt_vhost_user_init() will gain a > memory_isolation argument in a future patch. > > Linear reviews of the patch series are easiest for reviewers. Please > reorder this so that vhost_user_init() and net_pass_vhost_user_init() > are changed first. You can hardcode the argument to false in those > patches. This patch can be moved afterwards so that memory_isolation is > never dead code. Now fixed for the next rev. This and the previous patch are swapped, with hardcoded values of memory_isolation used until the property is added to net.json. On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 5:27 AM Hanna Czenczek <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have a gut feeling there ought to be a better way to add an option the > only works for vhost-user, but maybe not. I certainly don’t have a > constructive suggestions. :) > > (Apart from that, my only comments would be the QAPI “since” field > missing, as Markus noted on the previous patch, and the patch ordering > Stefan has noted.) > > Hanna > Added "Since 11.2" to both locations in net.json.