Re: [PATCH 3/8] dirty-bitmap: fix integer overflow in serialization coverage
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.qemu.block,gmane.comp.emulators.qemu |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11.08.26 20:38, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> The chunk size is an int and is shifted left by 3 before the result is
> widened, so a chunk size of 1 << 28 or above overflows.
>
> parallels passes s->cluster_size, which parallels_open() lets reach
> 2 GiB. With a bitmap needing two L1 entries the bogus limit makes the
> "bm_size - offset" in parallels_load_bitmap_data() underflow; both
> wrong values slip past the assertions in serialization_chunk() and the
> resulting index lands outside the hbitmap, so a 128 KiB image memsets
> unrelated memory through hbitmap_deserialize_ones().
>
> Widen the shift. qcow2, the only other caller, never exceeds a 2 MiB
> cluster.
>
> Fixes: 35f428ba3971 ("qcow2-bitmap: make bytes_covered_by_bitmap_cluster() public")
> Cc: Eric Blake <[email protected]>
> Cc: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <[email protected]>
> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thomas Huth <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <[email protected]>
> ---
> block/dirty-bitmap.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/dirty-bitmap.c b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
> index 13a1979755..9fda3a4b98 100644
> --- a/block/dirty-bitmap.c
> +++ b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
> @@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ uint64_t bdrv_dirty_bitmap_serialization_coverage(int serialized_chunk_size,
> const BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
> {
> uint64_t granularity = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_granularity(bitmap);
> - uint64_t limit = granularity * (serialized_chunk_size << 3);
> + uint64_t limit = granularity * ((uint64_t)serialized_chunk_size << 3);
>
> assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(limit,
> bdrv_dirty_bitmap_serialization_align(bitmap)));
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <[email protected]>
I think, it's good to pick this one for my next pull request with another
bitmap-related fixes.
Thanks, applied to my block branch (this one 3/8 patch).
--
Best regards,
Vladimir