Re: SID Comparisons
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <[email protected]> Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:27:16 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.sid.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi - > Okay, just a little bit more. Is there any hard statistic like for > example i read somewhere in the milis archive someone mentioned > about 1000MIPS performance or something? Numbers like that depend on too many factors to answer simply. sid is highly configurable, and some options allow trading off between performance, debuggability, simplicity. > And maybe some opinion about what makes SID stands up against the > others. Sorry, that sort of comparison will be up to you. A key part of making such a paper interesting coming up with different axes along which the tools may be compared. An overall "winner" is very rare. > I mean, in my report i have to somehow shows that SID is relatively > better in comparison. We'll of be glad if that comes out as your conclusion, but you certainly shouldn't pre-judge. I'm sure we'd be curious to read your paper when it's finished, so please don't forget to send a link! - FChE