Re: Modern emulation solutions

"Gillespie, Josh" <[email protected]> Fri, 4 Jan 2019 14:06:59 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.emulators.tn5250
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Not sure if this help, but we just swapped out all of our twinax lines and use Raspberry Pi’s running Raspbian and TN5250 for emulation. It works for both Display and Printer emulation.

Josh Gillespie


> On Jan 4, 2019, at 8:54 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This list seems pretty dead, but also seems the most apropos to my
> question. 
> 
> I recently acquired a 5362 System/36 that actually IPLs and runs with an
> internal 30 and 60 MB hard disk.  It came with a 3179 terminal.  But I
> started looking at some more practical (and lighter) communication
> options - particularly for data transfer - and only found the suite of
> products by twindata.com.  Which seems ok for basic emulation but
> overpriced for a data transfer solution. 
> 
> After browsing countless eBay listings for ISA & PCI twinax emulation
> cards, I visually noticed a common hardware pattern in the component
> selection so I started digging a little deeper.  It turns out the wire
> level protocol on midrange twinax ports isn't that complex. 
> Electrically it's basically differential TTL.  The protocol is
> essentially 1 Msps Manchester encoding with a default idle wire state,
> simple pre and post ambles, and simple framing.  A lot of the cards I've
> found use a common framer ASIC but that could easily be replicated with
> a small FPGA and some line drivers / opamps.  And iCE40up5k could do the
> entire job including USB and frame buffers.  A BoM cost (not including
> twin-ax dongle) would be < $25. 
> 
> It would be fairly easy to build a completely opensource USB to twinax
> adapter (or Ethernet or ...) but the protocol payload seems like an
> ocean I don't want to fill with a kitchen tap of time. 
> 
> How feasible would it be to leverage something like the tn5250 code base
> on top of a custom hardware bridge to create a modern twinax emulation
> solution?  Are the payload formats over twinax and the IP encapsulation
> similar? 
> 
> Other than a few retro enthusiasts, how much interest would there be in
> such a design?  The last thing I want to do it tank segment of
> TwinData's market to make what is probably an already shaky business
> unstable then I run out of time and can't support things.  I would hate
> to leave the community with less options by creating more. 
> 
> Just curious on thoughts from what seems like a 5250 core user base. 
> 
> In the meantime, I may build a simple sniffer to eves-drop on the line
> and capture a communication dump of the S/36 and terminal to see if the
> payload looks sane. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> -Alan
> -- 
> This is the Linux 5250 Development Project (LINUX5250) mailing list
> To post a message email: [email protected]
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/linux5250
> or email: [email protected]
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at https://archive.midrange.com/linux5250.
> 
-- 
This is the Linux 5250 Development Project (LINUX5250) mailing list
To post a message email: [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/linux5250
or email: [email protected]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/linux5250.