Re: Compile and run later

--- In [email protected], scott <svetter@...> wrote:
>
>    Well the better choice would have been using a scripting language
> such as CLIST.  The problem with COBOL, FORTRAN, and the 
> like is that
> they were designed to be used as the batch programming 
> language or used
> inside of the OLTP facility called CICS.

What's wrong with CALLing a Fortran program
from TSO, perhaps with a front-end CLIST?

Surely that's just as good as batch?

CLIST sort of gives you the advantage of being able
to trap the output in another CLIST.

C programs can now also behave like that so
that you can trap the output.

(to Ron)
Regarding viewing PDSes, instead of trying to edit
with "e" try getting a member list with "m".

BFN.  Paul.