Re: WineX and the AFPL

Ove Kaaven <[email protected]> writes:

> Major code will probably not be released to ReWind before there's less of
> a risk of Wine "stealing" the code without giving anything similarly major
> back to ReWind (and I don't think any LGPL proponents should have trouble
> understanding that line of thinking).

Of course a quick look at the rewind-cvs list will show that a lot of
code has been flowing from Wine to Rewind already. But I guess that
doesn't count since it wasn't written by the evil LGPL guys?  The only
code that has any value is the one you cannot have, right?

> But I already applied a wineoss
> performance patch to ReWind a week or two ago, and was wondering if it'd
> show up in Wine without me doing anything further. (Seems not, so maybe
> I'll have to send that kind of thing to rewind-patches next time.)

If you want your patches to get into Wine you have to send them to
wine-patches (of course if anybody feels like picking up the patches
from Rewind and submitting them to wine-patches they are welcome to do
it).

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
[email protected]