Re: Dangerous back door in the LGPL

Brett Glass wrote:

>At 03:52 PM 5/31/2002, Brian Vincent (C) wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I wouldn't exactly call this news.  This has been pointed
>>out for years and for the same number of years people have
>>been removing that little clause or prepending it with
>>a note that the software is licensed only under a specific
>>version.
>>    
>>
>
>True. Alas, as usual, many people who are less observant, or
>don't want to wade through the legalese, have just followed
>Stallman's instructions. Another example of a way in which
>Stallman and the FSF are deceptive in their claims and
>practices.
>
>--Brett Glass
>
>
>  
>
<Flame on>
Stay away from this list untill you can contribute something usefull.
<Flame o .... oh what the hell leave the damb thing burn....

.