bias...
Marco Pietrobono <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.wine.license |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[snip] > From: "Deven T. Corzine" <[email protected]> > To: Tony Lambregts <[email protected]> [snip] > I'm forming an opinion as I go, based on the discussion as it progresses. > But I'm starting from a place of neutrality. I'm not starting with any > initial bias and looking to justify that bias. It's a trade-off. The more > knowledge and information I have, the less neutral I become as I form a new > bias based on what I've learned. I'll have a more informed opinion, but it > will carry a bias towards that opinion that will make it harder to shake. It's nice you are saying so, because from your following e-mail, I wasn't so sure you were so unbiased... You already have a very strong opinion and you are only trying to show yourself as an unbiased and neutral observer, but you points are really clear... At least we are not trying to pose as a "neutral and unbiased observer". [snip] > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 11:01:49 -0400 (EDT) > From: "Deven T. Corzine" <[email protected]> > To: Roger Fujii <[email protected]> > cc: Dmitry Timoshkov <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: WineX and the AFPL > > On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Roger Fujii wrote: > > > I, for one, don't think that you have to hand over your entire wallet to > > make a contribution. > > This is a good analogy. The *GPL licenses are like a commune where members > donate ALL their income to the common pool. Since everyone contributes all > they can, some call this "fair". Then again, someone with above-average > income might consider it "unfair" that they would have to shoulder more > than their share of the burden just because they earn more money. (This is > a bit like income taxes too, I guess...) nobody is forced to use a *GPL codebase. If you don't like it, you can always rewrite all by yourself and stop whining. The *GPL licenses are only a set of rules for a game. If you want to play that game, you need to respect the rule. If you don't want to play that game, you can always find another game to play. It's not right to ask for change of rules just because you don't like them. and BTW, the state forces you to pay your taxes. You can't avoid that. > A cooperative is a reasonable alternative to a commune. If everyone is > expected to contribute equal amounts, some would call this more "fair" than > the "contribute everything" model of a commune. And yet, some of those in > a commune would cite the cooperative as "unfair" because the poorer members > have to pay a disproportionate percentage of their income. Who's right? > > Why do I get the feeling that which is more fair is really a classic debate > with no objective right answer, just differences of opinion based on each > point of view? Are the *GPL camps and the hopeful patch-traders inherently > on opposite sides of this classic debate? Is it then irreconcilable? why don't you understand that sometimes, just sometimes, there are greater issues than the simpler "how can I gain something from that"? Sometimes you need to show that you are committed to what you are doing and thinking, and this is that time for Alexandre. If he had choosen the small-term gain instead of beeing coerent with his decision, he would have thrown away all his hard work for nothing. He has done a choice and he is risking much to be coerent with it. You should respect and try to understand that choice, instead of bickering. bye, /pietrobo -- Stud. Marco Pietrobono | Murphy's Law: if something could v. del Calice, 39 - 00178 ROMA | go wrong, it does. Tel. +39.06.7186329 339.7410893 | Legge di Murphy: se qualcosa può http://www.pietrobo.com | andar male, lo farà. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Strange game. The only winning move is not to play. What about a nice play of chess ?
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 244 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Per informazioni si veda http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA8/QO0JdpOg6vRQxoRAv/DAJ9BIPUWR6KwZW8x/3DdFqrL3ctGOACgltzZ maffQ0/b4VeNbk6NXlFLUOs= =qYQT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----