Re: Stallman's world domination tour
"Sean C. Farley" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.wine.license |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 13:36, Matt Seitz wrote: > --- "Deven T. Corzine" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does this make BSD/X11 licenses "superior" to *GPL licenses? They > > tend to lead to both altruism and commercialism, don't they? (But > > do they provide the right balance?) > > Good point. I do not know whether the benefits outweigh the risks of > commercial interests simply exploiting the altruism of others. > Apparently, many Wine developers felt Wine was either already > suffering from such exploitation or was at risk of becoming exploited. > The BSD Unix and X/Windows projects, on the other hand, appear to have > found the opposite to be true. I would be interested in learning more > about the experiences of projects that have tried the BSD/X11 license. XFree86 is doing well. They will be getting some new code in Q4 of 2002 for a card I really want to get: http://www.tungstengraphics.com/projects.html (at the end of the page). FreeBSD has received Vinum (volume manager), SoftUpdates (file system enhancement), and SMP (initially from BSDi, I believe). PostgreSQL is under the BSD license. The project is doing well. Unfortunately, the consulting company did not. Apache. What more can I say? They have many projects within their fold. OpenSSL is number one. modssl. It is now within Apache. Zsh. My new favorite shell. Enlightenment. v0.17 is long-awaited, but the core has changed quite a bit. Winamp. I believe the source to Wasabi (cross-platform GUI) will be released under the BSD license, but I am uncertain. EPIC (http://www.epicsol.org/). My favorite IRC client. Their site is out of date, but the change log shows a lot of work being done. Sean -------------- [email protected]