Re: GPL vs. sweatshops (was Re: Bias)

John Alvord <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.emulators.wine.license
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:15:11 -0400 (EDT), "Deven T. Corzine"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
>> Do you have hard numbers to show that programmers who work on proprietary
>> software are better compensated than those that work on Open Source
>> software?  For that matter, do you have any evidence that Open Source
>> programmers are *undercompensated* by any standard?
>
>Well, considering many Open Source programmers donate their time for free, 
>it stands to reason that ZERO is indeed undercompensation.  They may do it 
>of their own free will, but it remains true that volunteers don't get paid 
>what their efforts are worth.

Clearly, though, people doing that work feel compensated in some way,
else why would they continue? Maybe, for them, "pay" is not the sole
measure of recompense.

john alvord
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.