Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] xen/sched: core: kill unarmed timers on sched_init_vcpu() failure

Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 19.08.2026 12:39, Furkan Çalışkan wrote:
> On 8/19/26 10:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.08.2026 07:15, Furkan Caliskan wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/common/sched/core.c
>>> +++ b/xen/common/sched/core.c
>>> @@ -589,6 +589,9 @@ int sched_init_vcpu(struct vcpu *v)
>>>      unit->priv = sched_alloc_udata(dom_scheduler(d), unit, d->sched_priv);
>>>      if ( unit->priv == NULL )
>>>      {
>>> +        kill_timer(&v->periodic_timer);
>>> +        kill_timer(&v->singleshot_timer);
>>> +        kill_timer(&v->poll_timer);
>>>          sched_free_unit(unit, v);
>>>          rcu_read_unlock(&sched_res_rculock);
>>>          return 1;
>>
>> This almost, but not quite open-codes sched_destroy_vcpu(). Would be nice
>> if the cleanup logic was shared. The sched_free_unit() call there could be
>> leveraged here as well; what would need skipping are the sched_free_udata()
>> and sched_remove_unit(). And of course the RCU-locking would need sorting.
> 
> Would something like below be okay?

Maybe, but you need to ask the maintainers of this code, which I'm not a part
of. What I in particular can't easily judge is whether ...

> --- a/xen/common/sched/core.c
> +++ b/xen/common/sched/core.c
> @@ -589,8 +589,8 @@ int sched_init_vcpu(struct vcpu *v)
>      unit->priv = sched_alloc_udata(dom_scheduler(d), unit, d->sched_priv);
>      if ( unit->priv == NULL )
>      {
> -        sched_free_unit(unit, v);
>          rcu_read_unlock(&sched_res_rculock);
> +        sched_destroy_vcpu(v);
>          return 1;
>      }

... this intermediate dropping of the lock is entirely okay (it looks to be
at the first glance).

Jan

> @@ -869,8 +869,11 @@ void sched_destroy_vcpu(struct vcpu *v)
>      {
>          rcu_read_lock(&sched_res_rculock);
>  
> -        sched_remove_unit(vcpu_scheduler(v), unit);
> -        sched_free_udata(vcpu_scheduler(v), unit->priv);
> +        if ( unit->priv )
> +        {
> +            sched_remove_unit(vcpu_scheduler(v), unit);
> +            sched_free_udata(vcpu_scheduler(v), unit->priv);
> +        }
>          sched_free_unit(unit, v);
>  
>          rcu_read_unlock(&sched_res_rculock);
> 
> 
> Furkan
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.