[PATCH 2/6] xen/arm: Introduce arm_smccc_guest_smc()

Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Both {get,set}_user_reg() are out-of-line functions, leading to awful code
generation.

Introduce arm_smccc_guest_smc() to operate directly on guest registers.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>
---
CC: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]>
CC: Julien Grall <[email protected]>
CC: Volodymyr Babchuk <[email protected]>
CC: Bertrand Marquis <[email protected]>
CC: Michal Orzel <[email protected]>
CC: Jan Setje-Eilers <[email protected]>

For arm64:

  add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 2/4 up/down: 27/-864 (-837)
  Function                                     old     new   delta
  symbols_addresses                          35096   35120     +24
  symbols_names                              42958   42961      +3
  imx8qm_smc                                   544     348    -196
  scmi_handle_smc                              372     152    -220
  imx8m_smc                                    576     356    -220
  zynqmp_eemi                                  864     636    -228

For arm32:

  add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-160 (-160)
  Function                                     old     new   delta
  scmi_handle_smc                              392     232    -160
---
 xen/arch/arm/firmware/scmi-smc.c            | 16 +-----------
 xen/arch/arm/include/asm/smccc.h            | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++
 xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8m.c              | 16 +-----------
 xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8qm.c             | 16 +-----------
 xen/arch/arm/platforms/xilinx-zynqmp-eemi.c | 17 ++----------
 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/firmware/scmi-smc.c b/xen/arch/arm/firmware/scmi-smc.c
index 0835ddeeeccc..a0cc6c6192f8 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/firmware/scmi-smc.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/firmware/scmi-smc.c
@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ static bool scmi_is_valid_smc_id(uint32_t fid)
 static bool scmi_handle_smc(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
 {
     uint32_t fid = (uint32_t)get_user_reg(regs, 0);
-    struct arm_smccc_res res;
 
     if ( !scmi_is_valid_smc_id(fid) )
         return false;
@@ -63,20 +62,7 @@ static bool scmi_handle_smc(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
     }
 
     /* For the moment, forward the SCMI Request to FW running at EL3 */
-    arm_smccc_1_1_smc(fid,
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 1),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 2),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 3),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 4),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 5),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 6),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 7),
-                      &res);
-
-    set_user_reg(regs, 0, res.a0);
-    set_user_reg(regs, 1, res.a1);
-    set_user_reg(regs, 2, res.a2);
-    set_user_reg(regs, 3, res.a3);
+    arm_smccc_guest_smc(regs);
 
     return true;
 }
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/smccc.h b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/smccc.h
index 53cdddb690b7..832157f43734 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/smccc.h
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/smccc.h
@@ -202,6 +202,21 @@ struct arm_smccc_res {
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32
 #define arm_smccc_1_0_smc(...) arm_smccc_1_1_smc(__VA_ARGS__)
 #define arm_smccc_smc(...) arm_smccc_1_1_smc(__VA_ARGS__)
+
+/* Make an SMCCC v1.1 compliant SMC call with guest register state. */
+static inline void arm_smccc_guest_smc(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
+{
+    struct arm_smccc_res res;
+
+    arm_smccc_1_1_smc(regs->r0, regs->r1, regs->r2, regs->r3,
+                      regs->r4, regs->r5, regs->r6, regs->r7, &res);
+
+    regs->r0 = res.a0;
+    regs->r1 = res.a1;
+    regs->r2 = res.a2;
+    regs->r3 = res.a3;
+}
+
 #else
 
 void __arm_smccc_1_0_smc(register_t a0, register_t a1, register_t a2,
@@ -251,6 +266,20 @@ void __arm_smccc_1_0_smc(register_t a0, register_t a1, register_t a2,
             arm_smccc_1_0_smc(__VA_ARGS__);                     \
     } while ( 0 )
 
+/* Make an SMCCC v1.1 compliant SMC call with guest register state. */
+static inline void arm_smccc_guest_smc(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
+{
+    struct arm_smccc_res res;
+
+    arm_smccc_1_1_smc(regs->x0, regs->x1, regs->x2, regs->x3,
+                      regs->x4, regs->x5, regs->x6, regs->x7, &res);
+
+    regs->x0 = res.a0;
+    regs->x1 = res.a1;
+    regs->x2 = res.a2;
+    regs->x3 = res.a3;
+}
+
 /*
  * struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs - Arguments for or Results from SMC call
  * @a0-a17 argument values from registers 0 to 17
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8m.c b/xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8m.c
index 669dd517e057..efb0ad20d6e8 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8m.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8m.c
@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ static bool imx8m_smc(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
 {
     uint32_t function_id = get_user_reg(regs, 0);
     uint32_t subfunction_id = get_user_reg(regs, 1);
-    struct arm_smccc_res res;
 
     if ( !cpus_have_const_cap(ARM_SMCCC_1_1) )
     {
@@ -122,20 +121,7 @@ static bool imx8m_smc(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
         return false;
     }
 
-    arm_smccc_1_1_smc(function_id,
-                      subfunction_id,
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 2),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 3),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 4),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 5),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 6),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 7),
-                      &res);
-
-    set_user_reg(regs, 0, res.a0);
-    set_user_reg(regs, 1, res.a1);
-    set_user_reg(regs, 2, res.a2);
-    set_user_reg(regs, 3, res.a3);
+    arm_smccc_guest_smc(regs);
 
     return true;
 }
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8qm.c b/xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8qm.c
index 3600a073e8ba..7249e14ab640 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8qm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8qm.c
@@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ static bool imx8qm_smc(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
 {
     uint32_t function_id = get_user_reg(regs, 0);
     uint32_t subfunction_id = get_user_reg(regs, 1);
-    struct arm_smccc_res res;
 
     if ( !cpus_have_const_cap(ARM_SMCCC_1_1) )
     {
@@ -106,20 +105,7 @@ static bool imx8qm_smc(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
     }
 
  allow_call:
-    arm_smccc_1_1_smc(function_id,
-                      subfunction_id,
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 2),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 3),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 4),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 5),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 6),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 7),
-                      &res);
-
-    set_user_reg(regs, 0, res.a0);
-    set_user_reg(regs, 1, res.a1);
-    set_user_reg(regs, 2, res.a2);
-    set_user_reg(regs, 3, res.a3);
+    arm_smccc_guest_smc(regs);
 
     return true;
 }
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/platforms/xilinx-zynqmp-eemi.c b/xen/arch/arm/platforms/xilinx-zynqmp-eemi.c
index 2053ed7ac5f6..326c8a1ba6e5 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/platforms/xilinx-zynqmp-eemi.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/platforms/xilinx-zynqmp-eemi.c
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ static inline bool domain_has_reset_access(struct domain *d, uint32_t rst)
 
 bool zynqmp_eemi(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
 {
-    struct arm_smccc_res res;
     uint32_t fid = get_user_reg(regs, 0);
     uint32_t nodeid = get_user_reg(regs, 1);
     unsigned int pm_fn = fid & 0xFFFF;
@@ -187,20 +186,8 @@ bool zynqmp_eemi(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
      * can forward the whole command to firmware without additional
      * parameters checks.
      */
-    arm_smccc_1_1_smc(get_user_reg(regs, 0),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 1),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 2),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 3),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 4),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 5),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 6),
-                      get_user_reg(regs, 7),
-                      &res);
-
-    set_user_reg(regs, 0, res.a0);
-    set_user_reg(regs, 1, res.a1);
-    set_user_reg(regs, 2, res.a2);
-    set_user_reg(regs, 3, res.a3);
+    arm_smccc_guest_smc(regs);
+
     return true;
 
 done:
-- 
2.39.5
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.