RE: FIPS Java API provider and non-FIPS provider

Nevermind. I also noticed that we include apache-cxf within our application WAR. It has a dependency on org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-ws-security which has a dependency on opensaml; we changed are packaging to exclude opensaml from the WAR since it was included on the system path. I really do not think we can resolve this conflict other than changing opensaml (and resolving any impacts on those third-parties that depend on it).


From: Rhuberg,Anthony
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 9:53 AM
To: 'David Hook' <[email protected]>; Matti Aarnio <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [dev-crypto] FIPS Java API provider and non-FIPS provider

Is there a way to identify the bc-fips dependencies (pom.xml or other list) so that we can package them within our application war. Is it wrong to expect that Tomcat will resolve all dependencies if found by the WAR class loader and therefore not resolve down to the system class loader – or is this just a bad idea.

Thanks,
Tony

From: David Hook [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 6:18 PM
To: Rhuberg,Anthony <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Matti Aarnio <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [dev-crypto] FIPS Java API provider and non-FIPS provider


The high risk element is the JCE - it depends how it gets loaded and if both things make use of the respective providers. Often this means things end up in the system class loader and in that case there can be only one.

If bcprov isn't loaded in the system class loader and/or bc-fips is able to satisfy the dependency anyway, you will probably be okay.

General the problems you see if it is an issue don't make sense. You'll get issues with undefined methods, class not found, missing fields. In some cases you will get class cast exceptions where it seems impossible as well.

If you want to ask the OpenSAML guys to talk to us we would be happy to help them update.

Regards,

David

On 20/06/18 05:04, Rhuberg,Anthony wrote:
Just a follow up from my previous question…

We have a configuration with a Tomcat Valve which uses opensaml (with a dependency on xmlsec -> bcprov-jdk15on). These classes are part of the root class loader (call it CLroot).
We just started using bc-fips-1.0.1.jar for digital signatures in a web application. That jar is part of the war (call it CL1).

Based on this configuration, we expected to observe some conflict when executing the pathways for the Tomcat Valve and web application.

The applications are “working”, but worry that there is some unseen or potential problem that we have just not encountered.

Any thoughts? Do you have an examples of how a collision (between the 2 jars bcprov-jdk15on - bc-fips-1.0.1.jar ) would be manifest? Do you have examples of typical errors when there is a conflict?

Thanks,
Tony


From: Matti Aarnio [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2018 2:33 PM
To: Rhuberg,Anthony <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [dev-crypto] FIPS Java API provider and non-FIPS provider

Hi Tony,

The detail that affects more than "in same JVM" is "are they in same class loader?"

WARs are loaded into separate class loader chains.
WAR1 gets loader chain:  CL1, CLroot.
WAR2 gets loader chain:  CL2, CLroot.

If neither BCFIPS nor BCPROV are in CLroot, and instead in separate WARs,
then the libraries will not see each other, and no collision happens.

The "CLroot" is server/lib/ in current Tomcats.
The "CLn" is webapps/warname/WEB-INF/lib/

Best Regards, Matti

On 05.06.2018 21:01, Rhuberg,Anthony wrote:

We have an application deployed within Tomcat and that application is uses Apache CXF which has a dependency on bcprov-jdk15on-1.51.

Referring to: https://www.bouncycastle.org/fips-java/BCFipsIn100.pdf<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bouncycastle.org%2Ffips-java%2FBCFipsIn100.pdf&data=02%7C01%7CAnthony.Rhuberg%40Cerner.com%7Ce60fa34500a84aeb1a7a08d5cb12c856%7Cfbc493a80d244454a815f4ca58e8c09d%7C0%7C1%7C636638203905695412&sdata=wmqUcMfgAVX7I2s%2F6rXx2ZCBUnzZZRRMKMBWZXLPR3o%3D&reserved=0>: “The provider jar itself has no external dependencies, but it cannot be used in the same JVM as the regular Bouncy Castle provider. The classes in the two jar files do not get along”.

We are integrating FIPS Java API provider into another application WAR. We have not encountered an issues yet, but wanted to know what kinds of errors are expected if two applications use different Bouncy Castle Java implementations within the same JVM.

Thanks,Tony



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024.