Re: Public Key Extraction in Implicit Certificates (ECQV)

biscas <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Jul 2019 07:56:33 -0500 (CDT)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.bouncy-castle.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Peter,

The results of the tests with dummy_hash function == 0:

CA Public Key BouncyCastle
input: 03:03:8B:06:D2:86:55:52:31:3C:0A:13:E6:2B:22:F4:48:DE:CB:D1:E1:77
output: 03:06:79:D1:85:B2:E5:9F:F1:94:1C:07:FA:DE:E1:80:4A:32:9D:A4:97:11
CA Public Key Certicom
input: 02:00:FD:E8:A7:F3:D1:08:42:24:96:2A:4E:7C:54:E6:9A:C3:F0:4D:A6:B8
output: 02:00:FD:E8:A7:F3:D1:08:42:24:96:2A:4E:7C:54:E6:9A:C3:F0:4D:A6:B8
CA Public Key Base Point G
input: 03:02:FE:13:C0:53:7B:BC:11:AC:AA:07:D7:93:DE:4E:6D:5E:5C:94:EE:E8
output: 02:00:FD:E8:A7:F3:D1:08:42:24:96:2A:4E:7C:54:E6:9A:C3:F0:4D:A6:B8

I'll try runnign hundreds of tests, tomorrow; I have done different tests in
the past, though with not a dummy hash function ==0. I don't have access to
any other EC lib right now; I'll have a look at openssl...

The strange thing is that Certicom supposedly states that implements exactly
their SECG articles; and now it seems that somehow they restrict the usage
of their libs to Certicom issued points, in some strange way...

Kindly,

Manuel



--
Sent from: http://bouncy-castle.1462172.n4.nabble.com/Bouncy-Castle-Dev-f1462173.html