Re: Slow file sharing performance

Jon Bendtsen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.cipe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Tanel wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, James Knott wrote:
> 
> 
>>>>I've notice that while my CIPE VPN works, that SMB and NFS access of 
>>>>my home network from my notebook is slow.  However, going the other 
>>
>>One computer is a 1.113 GHz PIII, the other is an Athlon XP 1700.  I'd 
>>suspect both ends have sufficient horsepower.  Also, when watching the 
>>data lights flash, it's apparent that the data transfer stops entirely 
>>for quite a while.  I would expect transfers to be slower due to the 
> 
> 
> Cipe uses UDP protocol and it is very sensitive to packet latency and 
> packet loss. So I think UDP does not suite for a VPN, where files must be 
> transported. Try SSH tunnels instead.

well, ssh uses tcp, and tcp ontop of another tcp is a bad idea.
The CIPE homepage explains why.
Besides, NFS usualy uses UDP too, and i dont really see a reason why UDP 
is worse than TCP if just the application that uses the UDP has as good, 
or better handling of packetloss, as does TCP.



JonB


--
Message sent by the [email protected] mailing list.
Unsubscribe: mail [email protected], "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
CIPE info and list archive: <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.