Re: Slow file sharing performance
James Knott <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.cipe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Peter van den Heuvel wrote: >>> One other reason might be a firewall you are running. >>> You do must allow at least some ICMP to get through. >> >> The VPN works fine for everything but NFS and SMB, and the problem is >> only in the one direction. This would indicate that the firewall is >> passing all that's necessary for the vpn to operate. > > Not necessarily. The queries going one way are smaller than the results > that flow back. If somewhere along the line a packet gets fragmented > you'll recieve an ICMP must-fragment. If these are not processed you'll > see large amounts of re-transmits based on time-outs. I've run into that > problem myself quite some time ago. I've not seen any such ICMP messages, using Ethereal. > >> Also, there are no firewall rules applied to the vpn traffic. > > The relevant ICMP in this case comes over the "Internet" interface. My firewall is configured to allow ICMP. > >> My firewall runs IPTables on Red Hat 7.3 and the firewall rules allow >> ICMP from the outside world. > > OK, that should rule this one out. > >> If anyone is interested, I could send some Ethereal dumps of the >> situation. > > You also might want to play with some simulated load and traffic / > bandwith measurements. That might be easier to interpret that for > example NFS. It would also be relevant to know the difference in > ping-time and bandwith between native and cipe (both ways). > > Good luck, Peter > > -- Message sent by the [email protected] mailing list. Unsubscribe: mail [email protected], "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address. CIPE info and list archive: <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>