Re: CRC32 - thoughts on Gutmann response
"Eric M. Hopper" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.cipe |
|---|---|
| Organization | Omnifarious Software |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 12:09, Harald Koch wrote: > [ Finally, a technical discussion! >:] > > > I am however pleading for a reasonable view - if you are clever enough to > > toggle bits in the CRC and the IP length and IP csum and the TCP csum and > > still keep the TCP stream in step then there are any number of three letter > > agencies who would employ you immediately! > > This doesn't require any cleverness these days; the detailed techniques > are all published. A little research with Google and some C programming > knowledge are all that is required... And the worst part is, once someone figures out how, they just write a little program, and suddenly every idiot knows how. You have to assume that any vulnerability, no matter how tiny, will be quickly found out and exploited by all possible attackers. Have fun (if at all possible), -- There's an excellent C/C++/Python/Unix/Linux programmer with a wide range of other experience and system admin skills who needs work. Namely, me. http://www.omnifarious.org/~hopper/resume.html -- Eric Hopper <[email protected]>
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 185 B)
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/cyW2jtsvlOwvazYRAoqqAKDUgPP1VQFYEJMDYiN40Rwx8FDyLwCg35NV 5Avbscme5qWfbyO6WZWhHug= =hsxO -----END PGP MESSAGE-----