RE: Quake 3 with cipe
Rod Boyce <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:10:29 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.cipe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <A3240F62EF3C2749B1A25D3BC9548F41030970@ExchWENZ02.wenz.global.vpn> |
All, Are you sure these packets are CIPE related. I have seen both XP and Win 2000 generate a large amount of DNS packets if set up incorrectly. Let me see if I can remember the story. I set up a 2000 box and gave it a default gateway and DNS that was outside the lan. I also added it to a domain that it had not connected to yet. After rebooting the box and logging in locally I noticed that transfers were going very slow and that I had a lot to DNS traffic. It appered to me that the 2000 machine was doing a DNS lookup for every pactet it received and because the DNS server was outside the lan this generated a lot of traffic 2 to 3 times as I recall. I solved the problem by removing the default gateway as I did not need the machine to connect to the internet at that time. Once the machine logged on to the domain it settled down and started to work correctly. I have seen similar behavour from XP machines as well. Hope this helps I have been a very happy user of CIPE for a long time now it just runs they is nothing else I can say. Rod -----Original Message----- From: Richard Gregory [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:39 AM To: Mark Smith; [email protected] Subject: Re: Quake 3 with cipe Yes tried that one and it works fine. 1:1 packet balance at 2-3K bytes per second. Its only through cipe that this problem shows up, which is why I came to the cipe list in search of an answer. This is what it comes down to, with Q3 on XP (or 2K) *and* cipe, there are 4* or more many packets going to the server as either without cipe (direct) or with Q3 on Linux via cipe. Strange stuff... Richard +-- --+ | Computer Science, Room G34 | | http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~greg | | Electrical Engineering, Room ~104 | +-- --+ Mark Smith wrote: > I'm sure it's probably obvious, but have you actually tried the same > configurations, but using a direct connection between client and server > rather than through CIPE, to prove that this specific problem isn't > something to do with your configuration? If it's different then sure, it > might be CIPE. If it's not, then I'd probably blame something inside Q3 > itself. > > -- > Mark Smith - Avco Systems Ltd > email: [email protected] > Tel: +44 (0)1784 430996 Fax: +44 (0)1784 431078 > > > -- > Message sent by the [email protected] mailing list. > Unsubscribe: mail [email protected], "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body > Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address. > CIPE info and list archive: <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html> > -- Message sent by the [email protected] mailing list. Unsubscribe: mail [email protected], "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address. CIPE info and list archive: <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html> -- Message sent by the [email protected] mailing list. Unsubscribe: mail [email protected], "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address. CIPE info and list archive: <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>