Re: problem with cipe on x86_64

Ravi Kumar <[email protected]> Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:43:38 +0530
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.cipe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Tanel Kindsigo,
 Did you by any chance have the transfer rates measured? If so, share 
with us.
-Ravi

Tanel Kindsigo wrote:

>On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Richard Gregory wrote:
>
>  
>
>>>Tried to connect both machines with RedHat 7.3 router(cipe-1.4.5-9). 
>>>I used same configuration for both Whitebox machines. x86_32 worked well, 
>>>x86_64 did not. The connection was established, but if I tried to ping RH7.3 
>>>machine (193.40.x.x) from my Whitebox (192.168.1.213 behind NAT), then 
>>>tcpdump -i eth0 on WhiteBox showed that my ping requests were transferred 
>>>to the destination and replies even came back, but 
>>>tcpdump -i cipcb0 showed only icmp requests, not replies.
>>>      
>>>
>>Sounds like something else, does /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward = 1?
>>    
>>
>
>yes, it = 1, but it doesn't matter at all, on x86_32 i can run cipe even 
>with /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward = 0
>
>
>actually, i don't have problem any more, tried vtun software instead 
>cipe and got much better transfer rates with logging onto samba domain 
>server over tunnel. so i don't need cipe any more.
>
>
>--
>Message sent by the [email protected] mailing list.
>Unsubscribe: mail [email protected], "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
>Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
>CIPE info and list archive: <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>
>
>  
>




--
Message sent by the [email protected] mailing list.
Unsubscribe: mail [email protected], "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
CIPE info and list archive: <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>