Re: Cipe still vulnerable?

Les Mikesell <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:39:46 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.cipe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 10:24, Eric M. Hopper wrote:
> > 
> > today I have found a link that claims cipe to be vulnerable for being
> > easy to encrypt by third party and even being vulnerable to replay
> > attacks.
> > 
> > The page is quite old but as it is representing a mail archive, it may
> > be up-to-date?
> 
> I'm thinking that IPSEC + NAT-T will work out better for people.  Though
> I think IKE is ugly.  :-(

Is there an easy way to tell if a NAT device is NAT-T compatible? 
Another alternative is OpenVPN, but it looks much more difficult to
configure, especially compared to the RedHat releases that included
CIPE and made it a fill-in-the-form setup.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
    [email protected]



--
Message sent by the [email protected] mailing list.
Unsubscribe: mail [email protected], "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
CIPE info and list archive: <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>