Re: Syntax error near unexpected token `UTS_RELEASE,'

Claus Grill writes:
> Is OpenVPN as stable as CIPE? I was thinking about trying OpenVPN.
> 
> But CIPE works perfect, eventhough OpenVPN is probably less hard to get 
> running I suppose (No need for kernel modules). But the configuration of CIPE 
> is set up really fast.
> 
> Can OpenVPN deal with reboots and start the tunnel again? But it for sure does 
> that I suppose.

Let me summarize it this way: I sell network tunnels of multiple
types, and OpenVPN is what I use for my own home tunnel.

    - Like CIPE, OpenVPN uses UDP for transport, avoiding the TCP/TCP
      issues.  However, to avoid UDP-application/UDP issues OpenVPN
      can optionally use TCP for transport.

    - OpenVPN is easy to build, easy to configure, and easy to
      maintain.  It uses the 'tun' module included with every Linux
      distribution I know of.  Kernel upgrades do not require any
      OpenVPN changes or rebuilding.

    - OpenVPN glides gracefully through network breakages, remote-peer
      reboots, and dynamic IP changes.

    - OpenVPN supports Linux, *BSD, MacOS, Solaris, and Windows.

    - OpenVPN uses SSL/TLS certificates for authentication, with
      negotiated encryption keys.  (For simple setups, it also
      supports fixed-key operation.  It can even be run without
      authentication or encryption.)

    - OpenVPN supports optional LZO compression.  Net uncompressed
      data transfer rates sometimes exceed wirespeed.

    - OpenVPN supports bridging tunnels.  The tunnel type is a
      run-time option, not a compile-time option.

    - OpenVPN is under active development and maintenance, with a
      substantial user community and active forums.

--
Dick St.Peters, [email protected] 

--
Message sent by the [email protected] mailing list.
Unsubscribe: mail [email protected], "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
CIPE info and list archive: <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>