Re: Encryption and anonymity as top tools for images of child sexual abuse

David Honig <[email protected]> Wed, 2 Oct 2019 01:02:21 -0400 (EDT)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> On September 29, 2019 at 9:50 AM John Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> NYTimes lengthy report on out of control growth of images of child 
> sexual abuse highlights encryption and anonymity as premier tools for 
> avoiding discovery, prosecution and shutdown.
> 
> https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/09/28/us/child-sex-abuse.html
> 
> Silicon Valley giants are pilloried for failing to bar abusers.

Interestingly, either anonymity or encryption is sufficient to distribute naughty bits.  If they can't link them to you, or if they can't tell what you're getting, you have used anonymity or crypto-confidentiality correctly.

Anonymity is more than crypto ( == provides confidentiality, integrity, authentication ) because you need traffic-analysis resistance (routing confidentiality) which is harder.  If Tor was perfect you could exchange plaintext naughty bits though.

Of course they work best together: as anonymous as possible and encrypt all traffic (lest encrypted traffic draw suspicion, lest naughty plaintext interest traffic analysts).

Both of these annoy the herd-managers...

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> The cryptography mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography