Re: Very best practice for RSA key generation
Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> Mon, 28 Oct 2019 12:52:26 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMm+LwgQK9FO3n4ofLXN0-1jWMsEZ=2Gepv7deap8dFsZokesQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 6:35 PM Bill Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/17/2019 12:23 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > > The basic idea is that a user has a key which expressed in Base32 looks > > like this: > > > > ZAAA-UJUY-H7TF-SFLK-CWAW-TKC4-O5HQ > > This is a UI suggestion, not a cryptographic one, but in addition to > supporting keys like that, it might be useful to also allow keys > to be input in "Correct Horse Battery Staple" dictionary-word form. > That is already a suggestion in the Internet Draft but not one that has been implemented yet. The basic idea is to take dictionaries of 32,768 or so words for common languages, form a Merkle tree out of them and print the apexes out. These can then be used in combination with a simple Web Service that simply extracts the proof chain for specific words. With 65K words (feasible for English), that means 16bits per word. A 2^128 work factor requires ten words including the overhead. _______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list [email protected] https://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography