Re: Encryption doesn't seem to have bothered organisations who aren't the FBI
Florian Weimer <[email protected]> Sat, 16 Nov 2019 22:28:18 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Peter Gutmann: > Quoted from "Moscow contacted rebels charged with downing MH17: Investigators'" > https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/11/moscow-contacted-rebels-charged-downing-mh17-investigators-191114190558017.html > > "There was almost daily telephone contact between the leadership of the DPR > and their contacts in the Russian Federation," JIT [Joint Investigative > Team] said in a statement on Thursday, using the acronym of the Donetsk > People's Republic rebels. > > The calls mostly took place over secure phones provided by Russian security > forces, it said. > > Maybe the next time the FBI claim that the existence of encryption will lead > to the collapse of civilisation, they can ask the countries in the Joint > Investigative Team (Australia, Belgium, Malaysia, the Netherlands and Ukraine) > for help. The use of Russian military encryption doesn't seem to have > bothered them much. They did not decrypt the phone calls. The JIT wrote this earler in their witness appeal: | In addition to regular telephones, DPR-members used secure means of | communication. A number of these seem to be provided by the Russian | Federation and, moreover, used by Russian top officials in their | contact with the fighters. | | The JIT has found indications that the security service FSB provided | telephones that cannot be wiretapped. […] <https://www.politie.nl/themas/flight-mh17/witness-appeal-crash-mh17.html#alinea-title-means-of-communication> _______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list [email protected] https://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography