Re: Encryption doesn't seem to have bothered organisations who aren't the FBI
[email protected] Mon, 18 Nov 2019 12:26:16 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2019-11-16 20:35, Peter Gutmann wrote: > Maybe the next time the FBI claim that the existence of encryption will lead > to the collapse of civilisation, they can ask the countries in the Joint > Investigative Team (Australia, Belgium, Malaysia, the Netherlands and Ukraine) > for help. The use of Russian military encryption doesn't seem to have > bothered them much. The Joint Investigative Team knew that there were messages, but probably did not know what was in them. Encryption conceals the content of a message, but does not conceal where a message is coming from or going to, which is likely to be of more interest than the content of a message. For individuals in a big city contacting another individual in another big city, concealing the content may be more useful, but usually IPs leak rather specific identifying information. If a big server sets up a UDT4 IP rendezvous between two clients, the server has rather too much information, since the rendezvous necessarily contains rather specific id information, but any information about the volume, timing, and pattern of the ensuing client to client conversation is apt to get lost in an immense pile of client to client interactions downloading movies over bittorrent. So encryption wrapped in UDT4 would likely slow the FBI down a little. _______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list [email protected] https://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography