Re: Recent improvements on SHA-1 attacks

On 1/7/20 12:41 PM, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> An interesting paper has just appeared on the IACR e-print archive:
> 
>    SHA-1 is a Shambles: First Chosen-Prefix Collision on SHA-1 and Application to
>    the PGP Web of Trust
> 
>    https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/014.pdf
> 
> tl;dr: Attacks sped up by a factor of ~16 over previous work, chosen-prefix
> collision for ~$75k and 2 months effort.
> 
> It's a long (32 pages) but interesting read.  The only thing I have a bit of
> an issue with is the conclusion:
> 
>    SHA-1 signatures now offers virtually no security in practice
> 
> It should really be "SHA-1 signatures where the attacker has two months time
> and tens of thousands of dollars (there are some cheaper options than $75k) to
> prepare a forgery offer no security in practice".

But admittedly, the way that software systems are used these days, it's 
positively likely that among all of the users of a particular popular 
system (e.g., git) there are some where an adversary would think the 
investment worthwhile.

> Even then, the demonstrated attack relies on the ability to stuff arbitrary
> garbage data into the signed message (in this case into a JPEG image after the
> End-of-Image marker), so add:
> 
>    "... and the ability to stuff arbitrary attacker-chosen data into the signed
>    message..."
> 
> to that.

Oh sure, TLS will probably not be affected by this, but there are tons 
of protocols and file formats that will be. After reading PoC||GTFO, I'm 
thinking that there is almost nothing that can't also be a PDF.

Cheers

Stephan
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography