Re: SKS-Keyserver returns negative timestamp
Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-devel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 26 Feb 2024, at 14:29, Jan Girlich <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am doing a request to an SKS keyserver (sks.pgpkeys.eu) and receive > the following response: > > 'pub:AC71EF0964192842B15AFE6417EDE60510000001:0:0:-62135596800::' > > How is the timestamp '-62135596800' to be interpreted? It would normally be interpreted as “seconds before the epoch”, but in this particular case the key is unparseable, so the number is meaningless. Keys can be unparseable for many reasons, but the most common one is the use of an obsolete primary key algorithm, such as RSA512 or Elgamal encrypt-and-sign. A _______________________________________________ Gnupg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEKR55odxVrielLu+DXB7EBNWQZikFAmXcxxIACgkQXB7EBNWQ Zikp2Q/9GLWjeAMt2VVSQI3fNm3Nw4fFNHvAZboIz5K+txANoHERtQFKfeg+ssU6 LloNr59HnBwCr1KsXLwwobHiOFJSIC7KMF6TBg6A+r3A1wQRLlsdbRHsf3/xGq8Q D7TbO0cGZBvRFsro1ZXgMGXHJv41IiI5IO5ZJq5tz8OTNmp5DLPxcmDnm1qqMADc lQuUZ/YcCOg1fK+6/bIXqR/W3K9ei8TfGJKNnzSbJ4arQZzvJCmWJpChCtRJ2h8V dPaEZIz0hYmhrcaR/7Lk5EbMeXxGuHv9OSt5jgYeVNqPc90p+dylbRht4ZiC9IdQ +dHKy4JlVY9o9C9WfsEC2eGVUG5HNUGxyYSYFzcd+yaMmPU4CI15TQPQJJCIjH5d G94r5q7Zf10zAj7qDlqjZ3r2evLuPng/tIODncEaEJK3Hffg3JapTIkCS+5vL6Fj 9vdaAVuxDD00wKxeMRs8XMps+Kxi3EZKNR+9vBbyplDLelGDS444EQIqLopqqbb+ Dqv7LZr4VJj9l9qjFvlxFgUM6kiFKnS53t0jVOHhQXLp3jk9CF5YZGuAGD3/VjBw djDzZjeNCOIWXqH4qIpHtCiLxfCKi5W/xGuvGhkFvRnVcmOzkwJt9B07CVUng9Iq z1SFTpN3UbI29NjvTK8ut7jmzzUtggOmIrd6YV7lVPEJlUVotnc= =52XI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----