2.5.1 testing: gpgscm segfault

Marcel Telka <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.devel
Message-ID <ZuMIGDD1aGhZDfcU@telcontar>
Hi,

I'm running tests for GnuPG 2.5.1 on OpenIndiana and I found that the
gpgscm segfaults:


$ DIR=/data/builds/oi-userland/components/sysutils/gnupg
$ cd $DIR/build/amd64/tests/gpgscm
$ EXEEXT= GPGSCM_PATH=$DIR/gnupg-2.5.1/tests/gpgscm ./gpgscm $DIR/gnupg-2.5.1/tests/gpgscm/t-child.scm
Testing process and IPC primitives... 
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
$


$ mdb core
Loading modules: [ libc.so.1 ld.so.1 ]
> ::status
debugging core file of gpgscm (64-bit) from il-spr
file: /data/builds/oi-userland/components/sysutils/gnupg/build/amd64/tests/gpgscm/gpgscm
initial argv: ./gpgscm /data/builds/oi-userland/components/sysutils/gnupg/gnupg-2.5.1/tests/g
threading model: native threads
status: process terminated by SIGSEGV (Segmentation Fault), addr=414f43
> ::stack
do_process_spawn_io+0x333()
Eval_Cycle+0x5224()
scheme_load_memory+0x18a()
load.constprop.0+0xd8()
main+0x2c3()
_start_crt+0x87()
_start+0x18()
> do_process_spawn_io+0x333::dis
do_process_spawn_io+0x2ff:      js     +0xe4    <do_process_spawn_io+0x3e9>
do_process_spawn_io+0x305:      movslq 0xffffffffffffdfa4(%rbp),%rax
do_process_spawn_io+0x30c:      movq   %rax,%rdi
do_process_spawn_io+0x30f:      shrq   $0x6,%rax
do_process_spawn_io+0x313:      movq   0xffffffffffffdfd0(%rbp,%rax,8),%rax
do_process_spawn_io+0x31b:      btq    %rdi,%rax
do_process_spawn_io+0x31f:      jb     +0x1c3   <do_process_spawn_io+0x4e8>
do_process_spawn_io+0x325:      movslq 0xffffffffffffdfa8(%rbp),%rax
do_process_spawn_io+0x32c:      movq   %rax,%r8
do_process_spawn_io+0x32f:      shrq   $0x6,%rax
do_process_spawn_io+0x333:      movq   0xffffffffffffdfd0(%rbp,%rax,8),%rax
do_process_spawn_io+0x33b:      btq    %r8,%rax
do_process_spawn_io+0x33f:      jae    -0xb5    <do_process_spawn_io+0x290>
do_process_spawn_io+0x345:      movq   0xffffffffffffdf90(%rbp),%rdx
do_process_spawn_io+0x34c:      movq   0xffffffffffffdf80(%rbp),%rax
do_process_spawn_io+0x353:      movl   %r8d,%edi
do_process_spawn_io+0x356:      subq   %r13,%rdx
do_process_spawn_io+0x359:      leaq   (%rax,%r13),%rsi
do_process_spawn_io+0x35d:      call   -0x6642  <PLT=libc.so.1`read>
do_process_spawn_io+0x362:      testq  %rax,%rax
do_process_spawn_io+0x365:      je     +0x265   <do_process_spawn_io+0x5d0>
> 
$ 


Any idea or suggestion?


Thank you.

-- 
+-------------------------------------------+
| Marcel Telka   e-mail:   [email protected]  |
|                homepage: http://telka.sk/ |
+-------------------------------------------+
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.