Re: Adding a nounce before hashing as covert channel
Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-devel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12 Dec 2024, at 09:39, Rainer Perske <[email protected]> wrote: > > Due to the thermodynamic barrier, minor weaknesses in SHA-2 and SHA-3 do not matter due to the sheer length of the hash. > > And you are not protecting at all against major weaknesses in the hash algorithm and you are not even considering possible weaknesses in other protocol elements. It should be noted that the salt in v6 signatures also helps to protect against fault-based attacks. See https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/1014 A _______________________________________________ Gnupg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEKR55odxVrielLu+DXB7EBNWQZikFAmdavmYACgkQXB7EBNWQ ZikXng/8CtCxdgynpzG/MB13YIlbBRtTkVAUf8KqQ7yZAjSz5grKVcsyieHgv3zL 42JLn3Uqm/DeQTfTl9HIC+4A8eiDZovhgz6zGn+tHK2PFli7Ckars0AcSkCLskab vyDIjSoEKymy6Wig2d02T2lu9r3N5t6b39sl0EzkWcw+Xna+Hw0rGkVU8Y19T/0c Xzd4CUsQ5x39ggoq89/NbmvgsyNb+XGNZXcwY2Y0cZ+KOB+83k4bL8317isWhVBA y+/kX2YyqTgfz2qN/o9oUF7g2wZzONEikGRe/N4tGNCJr2OyIw0XHUSDKD6+oQp4 BOkxzWH/2qlyYC93TWlHZp+mlVxKpzVP2YvHNCEGGaFwyT51/Q8yfnWdo2bxBKX4 MfON8R3ixxVtzKzwfzSp9DKbUI/Acm8H+ehk9poQqYoFnUzQ9zoFsoagk2xF2AJ+ CoHZZHmoEpS3r4EHdjJISiCUOEj5jGFdu4S1WGc5i7Uz9gZdBi9obe1OgOkGh9HE 9UP+VKRmN5Uqn5NzywqZ3RaiGGWzfqQ8LdxEjTF2eIdVHGqicADV+VH7/9wm1McE T6dRtmGAdFr75C5QK6kupQn/gy5AVlFtiwNwzrPW0Gg0kGnO03s3pehCMYuaLZH3 yKuUb8Jv3lhlnbj9rPz7Qbgq7q+kQo5s/0H2wKrQHVrvzArTzo0= =cAPM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----