Re: Future of GpgME python bindings on PyPi

On Mittwoch, 19. März 2025 17:01:58 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Bernhard 
Reiter via Gnupg-devel wrote:
> Am Dienstag 18 März 2025 21:27:03 schrieb Ingo Klöcker:
> > On Dienstag, 18. März 2025 17:26:19 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Bernhard
> > Reiter via Gnupg-devel wrote:
> > > Ingo, Werner,
> > > 
> > > what is the state of the python bindings and g10code's plan for it?
> > 
> > I cannot speak for g10 Code.
> 
> that why I have also addressed Werner.
> And it would have been possible that you were working
> on the python bindings on behalf of g10code. :)
> 
> Thanks for your work on the python gpgme bindings!

I'm working on gpgme (mostly gpgme++ and qgpgme) on behalf of g10code. My 
little work on the python bindings is just a byproduct.

> > I applied a few patches from others and made sure that it still builds
> > after the split. It also shows that the bindings are barely alive and it
> > gives me the impression that almost nobody cares.
> 
> Beside Lucas who has meanwhile replied, I've also got a personal email
> asking for the bindings and a technical analysis, and we've checked into the
> roundup issue. So there are at least three Free Software product that care
> a bit.

That's good to hear.

Regards,
Ingo

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYKAB0WIQTbjgIOMowwlCBgvyGxb1mVFkdKugUCZ9shGQAKCRCxb1mVFkdK
umWlAQDHWJfuNiHvpf121mamjZ1AM0LslXUQLScVGGWp1EsKQAEA5Cj5TR1xVO7e
7BndUCC3YLigKpVjMM6Liqc9h/pt1wI=
=2a7Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----