Re: Build requirements (was gpgmepy broken build)

Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.devel
Message-ID <2745879.vuYhMxLoTh@daneel>
On Sonntag, 4. Mai 2025 20:17:08 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit Genes Lists 
wrote:
> Am starting to feel like gpgmepy is kind of abandonware? Maybe its time
> to move on.

The Python bindings have been neglected for some time (except for minor 
maintenance). Paul has just started to change this.

Regards,
Ingo

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYKAB0WIQTbjgIOMowwlCBgvyGxb1mVFkdKugUCaBjOwAAKCRCxb1mVFkdK
us3xAPsFiv0q/G0qMntLcZs4FegdReWCuWe5IhoZ5c7CVuVWBwEAqaBZA+jgAEfQ
3wJwHOKgermSgfbYqFgrFlH8/xjBDQI=
=Zoq4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.