Re: [PATCH gnupg v15] Disable CPU speculation-related misfeatures
Werner Koch via Gnupg-devel <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:09:11 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi! I was about to apply the patch with additionl configure option but I now noticed that: > + gnupg_sleep (1); This is a no-go: It would drop performance too hard. We often call a dozen gpg processes per second and having each one to last at least a second decreases application performance in an inaccepatble way and, rightfully, user will report a bug. Doing this in the gpg-agent _might_ acceptable (because it is a long lasting process). For gpg, gpgconf, gpgsm, gpg-connect-agent, gpg-check-pattern it is a no-go. Did you actually tried to use gnupg in a real world application (reading and sending mails to several recipients, or browsing a list of signed mails)? What about codumenting your effort and providing a patch, so that ppl can apply it if they feeel they need it? Shalom-Salam, Werner -- The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that refuse military service. - A. Einstein _______________________________________________ Gnupg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 247 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQSHd0YfKgdOvEgNNZQZzByeCFsQegUCaHUPhw0cd2tAZ251cGcu b3JnAAoJEBnMHJ4IWxB6L0IBAKoSGSAwmIBy3TWmLkbzZgmnCrVA98HGAX3INDrS I5HwAQCZnJ+pymuu47uVtTbyMciY38CfuIWWNB1pa3xJ7AKsDQ== =kOzq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----