Re: GnuTLS | Support building with Nettle 4 (!2075)

Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>


Alexander Sosedkin commented: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2075#note_3119451688


I don't see any more mistakes in there, but I'm uneasy about "
accelerated: give up on defining nettle HMAC interface". What are the alternatives? Some dispatch to accelerated code on a higher level than nettle? Implement HMAC ourselves, bypassing nettle hmac interface? And, if we do neither, is the performance hit significant?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2075#note_3119451688
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. Unsubscribe from this thread: https://gitlab.com/-/sent_notifications/3-c8nff9f4p6ytuvad6kcp152z1/unsubscribe | Manage all notifications: https://gitlab.com/-/profile/notifications | Help: https://gitlab.com/help

_______________________________________________
Gnutls-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.