Re: GnuTLS | Support building with Nettle 4 (!2075)
Read-only notification of GnuTLS library development activities <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daiki Ueno commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2075#note_3121292078
> if we do neither, is the performance hit significant?
I don't think so; the nettle version provides comparable performance (or even outperforms) the CRYPTOGAMS version:
```console
$ gnutls-cli --benchmark-ciphers
[...]
Checking MAC algorithms, payload size: 16384
SHA1 1.05 GB/sec
SHA256 0.46 GB/sec
SHA512 0.68 GB/sec
$ GNUTLS_CPUID_OVERRIDE=0x1 gnutls-cli --benchmark-ciphers
[...]
Checking MAC algorithms, payload size: 16384
SHA1 2.06 GB/sec
SHA256 1.93 GB/sec
SHA512 0.58 GB/sec
```
We may even want to drop the CRYPTOGAMS derived assembly for hashes and macs in 4.0. I've added the topic at https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/wikis/Planning-for-4.0.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2075#note_3121292078
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. Unsubscribe from this thread: https://gitlab.com/-/sent_notifications/3-3m68xbxzu9yw5gx5zy6xcpy07/unsubscribe | Manage all notifications: https://gitlab.com/-/profile/notifications | Help: https://gitlab.com/help
_______________________________________________
Gnutls-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-devel